复杂山地风廓线雷达与L波段探空雷达测风对比分析

Comparing Wind Profiling Radar and L-band Radiosonde Measurements in Complex Terrain

  • 摘要: 为了解复杂山地环境下风廓线雷达资料的准确性和可用性,本文选取2023年1月—2024年6月贵阳站风廓线雷达观测资料和同址L波段探空雷达测风数据,通过计算uv分量的平均误差、标准偏差及有效样本率,分别在不同高度、不同时次和晴雨条件下对两种资料进行对比分析。结果表明:(1)风廓线雷达和探空测风结果有较好的一致性,uv分量的标准偏差分别为2.43 m·s−1和2.68 m·s−1,且风廓线雷达测得的u分量较L波段探空雷达测得的结果偏小,而风廓线雷达测得的v分量略偏大;(2)与L波段探空相比,近地面附近风廓线雷达测得的u分量偏大、v分量偏小,中高层风廓线雷达测得的u分量偏小、v分量偏大,各个高度上u分量的标准偏差在1.95~2.74 m·s−1之间,7 km以下v分量的标准偏差在1.67~2.96 m·s−1之间;(3)uv分量在北京时08:00的标准偏差分别为2.42 m·s−1和2.64 m·s−1,在20:00的标准偏差分别为2.43 m·s−1和2.72 m·s−1,20:00两种资料的偏差较08:00时偏大;(4)uv分量的标准偏差在有降水时分别为2.54 m·s−1和2.94 m·s−1,在无降水时分别为2.41 m·s−1和2.64 m·s−1,有降水时uv分量的标准偏差均大于无降水时,可见降水会对风廓线雷达的数据质量造成一定的影响。

     

    Abstract: To understand the accuracy and usability of wind profile radar data in complex mountainous terrain, wind profile radar data and L-band sounding radar wind data at Guiyang station from January 2023 to June 2024 were selected. A comparative analysis of the two datasets was conducted under the different altitudes, different observation times, and under clear versus rainy weather by calculating the mean error, standard deviation, and effective sample rate for the u and v wind components. The results showed that: (1) The wind profile radar and sounding wind measurements results had good consistency, with standard deviations of 2.43 m·s−1 and 2.68 m·s−1 for the u-component and v-component respectively. The u-component measured by the wind profile radar was smaller than that from the L-band sounding radar, while the v-component measured by the wind profile radar was slightly larger. (2) Compared with the L-band sounding, the u-component near the ground measured by the wind profile radar was larger and the v-component was smaller, while the u-component in the middle-to-upper level measured by the wind profile radar was smaller and the v-component was larger. The standard deviation of u -component at various heights ranged from 1.95 to 2.74 m·s−1, and the standard deviation of v-component below 7 km ranged from 1.67 to 2.96 m·s−1. (3) The standard deviations of u-component and v-component at 08:00 were 2.42 m·s−1 and 2.64 m·s−1, respectively, while those were 2.43 m·s−1 and 2.72 m·s−1 at 20:00. The deviation between the two types of data at 20:00 was larger than that at 08:00. (4) Under precipitation conditions, the standard deviations of u-component and v-component were 2.54 m·s−1 and 2.94 m·s−1, respectively, whereas under non-precipitation conditions those were 2.41 m·s−1 and 2.64 m·s−1. Standard deviations of u-component and v-component during precipitation were both larger than those without precipitation, it can be seen that precipitation will have a certain impact on the data quality of the wind profile radar.

     

/

返回文章
返回