ERA5和FNL资料在新疆的适用性对比分析

Comparative Analysis on the Applicability of ERA5 and FNL Data in Xinjiang

  • 摘要: 本文利用2019—2021年新疆105个国家基本气象站地面观测数据和其中14个站点的探空资料,对比评估欧洲中期天气预报中心ERA5和美国国家环境预报中心FNL资料在新疆的适用性。结果表明:ERA5数据的海平面气压、2 m温度、2 m露点温度和10 m风场的适用性优于FNL数据,其中2 m温度的适用性优于其他要素;海平面气压、2 m温度和2 m露点温度的适用性均存在显著的季节性差异;高空要素中,FNL数据的位势高度、露点温度的适用性优于ERA5数据,而ERA5数据的风场和温度的适用性较好;不同高度层面上,两套数据的适用性均是300 hPa以下优于300 hPa以上。

     

    Abstract: Based on the ground observation data of 105 national basic meteorological stations in Xinjiang and the sounding data of 14 stations from 2019 to 2021, the applicability of ERA5 and FNL data in Xinjiang was compared and evaluated. The results show that the applicability of sea level pressure, 2 m temperature, 2 m dew point temperature and 10 m wind field of ERA5 data is better than that of FNL data, and the applicability of 2 m temperature is better than that of other elements. There are significant seasonal differences in the applicability of sea level pressure, 2 m temperature and 2 m dew point temperature. Among the high-altitude elements, the applicability of FNL data to geopotential height and dew point temperature is better than that of ERA5 data, while the applicability of ERA5 data to wind field and temperature is better. At different height levels, the applicability of the two sets of data is better below 300 hPa than above 300 hPa.

     

/

返回文章
返回