2020年1月一次云贵准静止锋特征变化及对贵州降水的影响

Characteristic Changes of a Yunnan-Guizhou Quasi-stationary Front in January 2020 and Its Impact on Precipitation in Guizhou

  • 摘要: 本文选取常规地面、高空观测以及NCEP1°×1°再分析资料,针对2020年1月9—22日一次云贵准静止锋个例,采用统计和天气学诊断方法重点分析了云贵准静止锋特征变化、锋生机制及其对贵州降水的影响。结果表明:(1)云贵准静止锋维持期间,锋面作准东西向移动,锋面强度不断变化。当锋面位于103°E以西,锋面西移,强度减弱;当锋面位于104°E以东,锋面西(东)移,强度增强(减弱);当锋面位于103°~104°E之间时,锋面强度偏大。(2)云贵准静止锋移动和强度特征变化受到地面温压场、低空风场及锋后降水影响。准静止锋后冷区气压升高,气温降低,锋前暖区气压升高,准静止锋向西移动,反之则向东移动;当锋面位于104°E以西,700 hPa西南风增强,锋面东移;准静止锋后降水增强,锋面西移,锋后降水弱或无降水,锋面维持少动或东退。(3)锋生函数中的非绝热加热项(F1)对云贵准静止锋的日变化有明显影响,白天F1造成锋面东退减弱,夜间F1造成锋面西伸加强。锋生函数中的水平辐散项与水平变形项之和(F2+F3)在冷空气影响下主要起锋生作用,是云贵准静止锋形成的主要动力因子。(4)云贵准静止锋移动和强度变化特征与贵州降水相关性较弱。云贵准静止锋维持期间,贵州降水与500 hPa高空槽、700 hPa西南暖湿气流对应较好,贵州降水受其影响时范围扩大且强度加强。

     

    Abstract: Based on the ground and high-altitude observation data, NCEP1°×1°reanalysis data, a case of Yunnan-Guizhou quasi-stationary front (YGQF) on January 9—22, 2020 was selected. The characteristics of YGQF, the frontogenesis mechanism and its influence on precipitation in Guizhou were analyzed with statistical and synoptic diagnostic methods. The results showed that: (1) During the impact period of YGQF, the front moved eastward or westward, and the intensity of the front changed continuously. When the front was located to the west of 103°E, the front moved westward and its intensity weakened. When the front was located to the east of 104°E, the front moved westward and its intensity increased, otherwise it weakened. When the front was located between 103°E and 104°E, its intensity was strong. (2) The movement and intensity characteristics of YGQF were influenced by surface temperature and pressure, low-level wind, and precipitation of the front. When the pressure increased, the temperature decreased in the cold zone, and the pressure increased in the warm zone, the front moved westward, otherwise it moved eastward. When the front was located to the west of 104°E, the southwest wind at 700 hPa strengthened and the front moved eastward. When the precipitation of YGQF increased, the front moved westward, with weak or no precipitation, and the front moved eastward or remained stationary. (3) The non-adiabatic heating term (F1) in the frontogenesis function had a significant impact on the diurnal variation of YGQF. F1 caused the front to move eastward and weaken during the day, while F1 caused the front to move westward and strengthen at night. The sum of horizontal divergence term (F2) and horizontal deformation term (F3) mainly played a frontogenetic role under the influence of cold air, and was the main driving factor for the formation of YGQF. (4) The correlation was weak between the movement, intensity of YGQF and the precipitation in Guizhou. The precipitation in Guizhou corresponded well with the trough at 500 hPa and the southwest warm-humid airflow at 700 hPa during the maintenance period of YGQF. Under its influence, the precipitation range expanded and the intensity strengthened.

     

/

返回文章
返回